“Maverick” “Terrorist” “Socialist” “Liberal” “Conservative”
Is that all that John McCain can do? Create a one-word appellate for all issues, effectively reducing the entire issue to a few letters intended to evoke either loathing or loving? “I am a Maverick.” What does that even mean? How can you even pretend to know what issues are facing America or the problems with Washington when you have so long been immersed in them? And I do not mean to beat a dead horse, but this guy cannot even use a COMPUTER!! Obviously each one of you reading this has a leg-up on McCain because you are reading this right now.
Speaking briefly about the labels of liberal/conservative/republican/etc., I do not care. I do not want to hear them. It cheapens who you are by pigeon-holing you to a perceived set of ideologies and beliefs. In 1948, Utah was a Democratic state—54% of the population voted for Harry Truman. It has since swung to be severely Republican. I believe that Utah is still decidedly Republican, but slowly migrating the other way. Why? Because people are starting to look beyond the hot-button issues of abortion and gay marriage. I recently read an article in the magazine-for-imbeciles-of-Brobdingnagian-proportions, Schooled Magazine, which counseled all voters in Utah who planned on voting for Barack Obama to stay at home and not bother. His name is Scotty Spjut and his exact words on page 10 are, “So if you live in Utah and want to vote for Obama, don’t. The Democratic nominee has never collected more than 2 percent of the popular vote, making Utah redder than Communist Russia.”
That is the most dumbest of dumb person thing I have ever heard anyone say. Despite being entirely unoriginal in comparing “red” to Russia, it seems like that is the country that he wants to turn us into. First and foremost, vote because the Presidential candidates are only a few of the many names and issues on the ballot. These issues affect your taxes, your land, your apartment lease, your garbage collection, your education, and so much more. Your decision for whom to vote in a city or county election could have a far greater impact on your daily life than the whole McCain v. Obama debacle. Second, not voting is the most sissy and pansy copout I have ever heard of. You are akin to Pilate, washing your hands of the whole mess so that somewhere down the road, no matter who wins, you can feel blameless because you did not support either one. Thus said, if you have studied the issues and feel like you would be best served by voting for a third-party candidate, great! My good friend, Joe, has said that he is voting for Nader. That is awesome. He is exercising his right to vote. Just vote for someone, and please know why you are doing so.
Returning to Obama and the accusatory appellate of Socialist, how is that such a bad thing? And how is John McCain any less of a Socialist? John McCain wants to buy up all of the bad mortgages in the country. He would likely continue the bailouts of Wall Street and continue the financial backing of bad loans. Using the same definition of “Socialist” with which people are applying to Obama, Sarah Palin instituted some of the most Socialist policies in American history during her tenure in office in Alaska.
Most under fire is his tax policy of cutting the taxes for the middle and lower classes while repealing the tax breaks afforded to the top 1% of the population in recent history. He is not going above and beyond any taxes of the past. The rich will likely not even feel the pinch. I have another friend, Tim, of a different political persuasion who compares it to a student who studies and does well on a test only to find that all points above the threshold for an “A” will be donated to those who did not do as well. Speaking from the position of a student who regularly received good grades in our ridiculously easy and generally ineffective public education system, I say let them have them! As long as those who earned an “A” get an “A”, fine. Why should there be a cap on how much the rich put into the Social Security system? Why should they get a tax break? I want it! I do not want a handout. I do not want a gimme or a freebie. I want to keep what is mine. And honestly, given the choice between me paying more of my limited income or having those making over $250,000 a year pay more—have them pay it! I, too, consider myself to be in possession of an entrepreneurial spirit and hope to make more than that someday, but until that day, I would love to keep more of my earnings. Yes, even at the expense of them having to sell one of their boats, cars, or houses. One wealthy man recently decried Barack Obama, saying that if he wins, life is over for him and his family! He would not then have enough money to pay for his grandchildren’s college funds and they might have to earn their way through college. Well, shucks. I did not think of it that way. Fine, make me pay more taxes so that the grandchildren of these greedy, bloated, fart-bags can have their unappreciative grandchildren go to college on their dime. You win.
Speaking of college, that brings me to the titular subject of this post, “Why BYU Students are Socialists”. Quite simply, it can be summed up in three words—Pell Grant, Medicaid. It should come as no surprise to anyone that many in the LDS culture get married and have kids young. I am the father of one at 26. That is, by the standards of an Italian friend with whom I conversed today, “Stupificante” or stupefying. I stand by my wife and my decision and feel that marrying and having a child was the best one we ever could have made. What I am getting at here is this—Students do not qualify for Pell Grants until they are 24 years old…unless they are married. With such a high percentage of young BYU students married, many are getting a Pell Grant their freshman year and carrying it through the 5-6 years until they can settle on a major and graduate. According to one report, over 30% of BYU’s undergraduate students receive a Pell Grant. That’s more than any other university in the United States! Pell Grants and Welfare are simply steps towards Socialism, so if you are or have been a participant in either of these, do not talk to me about Obama being a Socialist. Unless, of course, you have paid the government back.
Tim also mentioned that the Presidential election has become somewhat of the appointment of a king. Frankly, and Tim too, I do not understand the “king” analogy. I agree that no President can fix all the problems. The Constitution denies him the power to do so. The entire premise of my post was to illuminate that John McCain is not necessarily the best choice for those who have traditionally aligned themselves with the Republican Party for no other reason than the cultural association between said party and the LDS faith. Religion should never be the sole basis of one’s vote, but especially not in an election as close as this one and especially not when the opposition party’s candidate is less congruous with your religious beliefs than your party’s candidate.
But one extremely important job of the President is to be a figurehead for the United States of America. Take the president at face-value, because that is pretty much what he is worth. As you mentioned in another comment, the conditions in this country will not improve until the people “buck up” and take responsibility. Thus said, the biggest impediment we currently face is fear. The money is still there, to a certain degree. The people, myself included, are simply more reluctant to spend it. Having an angry maverick, prone to publicity stunts and unorthodox aggressiveness will not help anything. Even if Obama does nothing more than keep a cool head in the world spectrum, that is enough for him to get my vote.
So, yeah. Another entry about how the ignorance and pigeon-holing surrounding this election gets under my skin. Just a little. Vote for whomever you will, just promise me that you will vote, and that it will be an educated vote.
And finally, if you disagree with me or find holes in my logic, please say something. Not doing so would be like you letting me go on TV with my zipper down. While I realize that many cannot discuss issues with someone of an opposing point of view without getting hot under the collar (McCain), please try. The world will be a much better place once we learn to educate and control ourselves.

